Abstract
Empathic accuracy, the ability to infer another person’s emotions, thoughts, and other fleeting mental states, has been linked to assumed similarity (wherein the perceiver assumes that another person’s mental states are similar to their own) and direct accuracy (wherein the perceiver uses various external cues to reach their judgment). Previous research has linked this component model, as well as dual process models, to neuroscientific models of empathy, but has not linked these components with dual process accounts directly. Thus, we examined whether assumed similarity involves rapid (type-1) processing while direct accuracy involves slower (type-2) inferences. In three dyadic daily diary samples (total N = 262 romantic couples), we examined associations between both components and response times. As expected, direct accuracy, but not assumed similarity, was associated with slower response times. Our findings suggest links between previously disparate lines of research and identify situations which may tip the balance between the empathic components.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 87-96 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Affective Science |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020, The Society for Affective Science.
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from the US-Israel Binational Science Fund (BSF) awarded to the fourth and fifth authors and by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation awarded to the fifth author. The first author is grateful to the Azrieli Foundation for the award of an Azrieli Fellowship supporting his work.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
US–Israel Binational Science Fund | |
John Templeton Foundation | |
United States - Israel Binational Science Foundation | |
United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation | |
Azrieli Foundation |
Keywords
- Close relationships
- Dual process
- Emotion perception
- Empathy
- Interpersonal accuracy