Factors relating to “Interferences” in communication between supervisor and supervisee: Differences between the external and internal supervisor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine differences, as perceived by supervisees, between supervisors employed within the same organization and their supervisees (“internal supervisors”) and supervisors employed outside their supervisees' organizations (“external supervisors”). It was hypothesized that differences would be found between them on factors related to “interferences” in supervisor-supervisee communication. As expected, external supervisors were found to provide more constructive criticism to supervisees than internal ones, to carry out more confrontation when necessary and appropriate, and to possess more expert-based authority (based on knowledge and skills) and less formal authority. No significant differences between the two groups were found regarding role ambiguity and conflict of supervisors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-85
Number of pages13
JournalThe Clinical Supervisor
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2001

Keywords

  • Authority
  • Confrontation
  • Criticism
  • External supervisors
  • Internal supervisors
  • Role ambiguity
  • Role conflict

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Factors relating to “Interferences” in communication between supervisor and supervisee: Differences between the external and internal supervisor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this