EXECUTIVE SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE, RISK-TAKING and LEVERAGE-NEUTRAL INCENTIVE SCHEME

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 23 out of 26 US industries, the annual CEO bonus is larger than the annual salary, suggesting that the bonus strongly affects the CEO's decisions. As the high leverage of financial institutions is often blamed for the 2008 financial crises, in this study we focus on leverage as a factor determining risk, particularly in financial institutions. The typical bonus scheme is not a leverage-neutral bonus scheme (LNBS), as the agent's optimal policy is to employ a corner solution: either zero or exteremely high leverage. Thus, consistent with Ross (2004), the bonus scheme does not neccesarily induce the agent to take greater risks. However, although more leverage is not prefered by all preferences, in most cases it is prefered. Thus, we suggest a combination of incentive parameters, which makes the agent indifferent to leverage, thereby preventing conflict beween the agent and the principal (stockholders).

Original languageEnglish
Article number2500030
JournalAnnals of Financial Economics
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2012

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2012 World Scientific Publishing Company.

Keywords

  • Executive compensations
  • JEL Classifications: G3
  • JEL Classifications: G38
  • JEL Classifications: J33
  • JEL Classifications: M52
  • bonus cap
  • leverage-neutral bonus scheme
  • risk-taking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'EXECUTIVE SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE, RISK-TAKING and LEVERAGE-NEUTRAL INCENTIVE SCHEME'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this