TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethanol sclerotherapy for management of endometriomas
T2 - an overview of systematic reviews
AU - Younis, Johnny S.
AU - Shapso, Nora
AU - Izhaki, Ido
AU - Taylor, Hugh S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Younis, Shapso, Izhaki and Taylor.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Evidence suggests that endometrioma cystectomy can significantly reduce ovarian reserve. Ethanol sclerotherapy is a promising, minimally invasive alternative. This overview aims to critically evaluate systematic reviews that addressed the safety and efficacy of ethanol sclerotherapy in women with endometrioma and compared it to endometriotic cystectomy. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Medline, Epistemonikos, the Cochrane Library, and PROSPERO using the search terms “endometriosis OR endometrioma AND sclerotherapy.” Key outcomes assessed included adverse events, technical efficacy, pain relief, endometrioma recurrence, impact on ovarian reserve, ART success, and pregnancy outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened, reviewed, and selected relevant publications. They also evaluated the quality of the included systematic reviews using the modified version of the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR2) tool. Furthermore, they assessed the strength of evidence for the primary outcome measures according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The study protocol was registered in advance at PROSPERO under registration number CRD42024595209 on 10 October 2024. Results: Nine systematic reviews were eligible, analyzing between 386 and 1,642 procedures. The reviews reported high technical efficacy (95.0%-98.3%) and low adverse events (11.0%-12.0% minor, 1.0%-1.7% major). Outcomes for pain relief, ovarian reserve, and pregnancy rates were generally favorable. Pregnancy rates for ethanol sclerotherapy and endometriotic cystectomy appeared comparable; however, sclerotherapy resulted in larger number of eggs retrieved and no loss of ovarian reserve. Overall, the strength of evidence for sclerotherapy was low to very low. though larger sample sizes supported findings on technical efficacy and adverse events. Conclusions: Ethanol sclerotherapy is a viable alternative to endometriotic cystectomy for treating endometrioma in reproductive-age women. It has the advantage of being safe and effective for pain relief and potentially superior to cystectomy in preserving ovarian reserve. Future studies should evaluate sclerotherapy compared to cystectomy and expectant management in randomized controlled trials. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024595209.
AB - Background: Evidence suggests that endometrioma cystectomy can significantly reduce ovarian reserve. Ethanol sclerotherapy is a promising, minimally invasive alternative. This overview aims to critically evaluate systematic reviews that addressed the safety and efficacy of ethanol sclerotherapy in women with endometrioma and compared it to endometriotic cystectomy. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Medline, Epistemonikos, the Cochrane Library, and PROSPERO using the search terms “endometriosis OR endometrioma AND sclerotherapy.” Key outcomes assessed included adverse events, technical efficacy, pain relief, endometrioma recurrence, impact on ovarian reserve, ART success, and pregnancy outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened, reviewed, and selected relevant publications. They also evaluated the quality of the included systematic reviews using the modified version of the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR2) tool. Furthermore, they assessed the strength of evidence for the primary outcome measures according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The study protocol was registered in advance at PROSPERO under registration number CRD42024595209 on 10 October 2024. Results: Nine systematic reviews were eligible, analyzing between 386 and 1,642 procedures. The reviews reported high technical efficacy (95.0%-98.3%) and low adverse events (11.0%-12.0% minor, 1.0%-1.7% major). Outcomes for pain relief, ovarian reserve, and pregnancy rates were generally favorable. Pregnancy rates for ethanol sclerotherapy and endometriotic cystectomy appeared comparable; however, sclerotherapy resulted in larger number of eggs retrieved and no loss of ovarian reserve. Overall, the strength of evidence for sclerotherapy was low to very low. though larger sample sizes supported findings on technical efficacy and adverse events. Conclusions: Ethanol sclerotherapy is a viable alternative to endometriotic cystectomy for treating endometrioma in reproductive-age women. It has the advantage of being safe and effective for pain relief and potentially superior to cystectomy in preserving ovarian reserve. Future studies should evaluate sclerotherapy compared to cystectomy and expectant management in randomized controlled trials. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024595209.
KW - endometrioma
KW - endometriosis
KW - endometriotic cystectomy
KW - ethanol sclerotherapy
KW - ovarian reserve
KW - overview
KW - systematic reviews
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105024469316
U2 - 10.3389/fendo.2025.1612899
DO - 10.3389/fendo.2025.1612899
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 41341130
AN - SCOPUS:105024469316
SN - 1664-2392
VL - 16
JO - Frontiers in Endocrinology
JF - Frontiers in Endocrinology
M1 - 1612899
ER -