Abstract
In the original version of the published Article, there was an error in the caption to Table 1 which stated “None of the differences are statistically significant (χ2, two-sided, p > 0.05)”. This has been changed to “The 18–24 year old are over-represented in the all user treatment population, while the 50–64 year old are underrepresented in both tracked and all user population, p-values were <0.05 for age groups and gender.” This has been corrected in the HTML and PDF version of the Article.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 38 |
| Journal | npj Digital Medicine |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 1 Dec 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018, The Author(s).
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: The effectiveness of public health advertisements to promote health: a randomized-controlled trial on 794,000 participants (npj Digital Medicine, (2018), 1, 1, (24), 10.1038/s41746-018-0031-7)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver