Erratum: Corrections: Authentic or Forged? What to Do When Experts Disagree (BAR (2012) (71))

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	71
Number of pages	1
Journal	Biblical Archaeology Review
Volume	39
Issue number	3
State	Published - May 2013

Cite this

@article{a2335c71b0854fd682814c0ec58deff7,

title = "Erratum: Corrections: Authentic or Forged? What to Do When Experts Disagree (BAR (2012) (71))",

author = "Edward Greenstein",

year = "2013",

month = may,

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "39",

pages = "71",

journal = "Biblical Archaeology Review",

issn = "0098-9444",

publisher = "Biblical Archaeology Society",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Corrections: Authentic or Forged? What to Do When Experts Disagree (BAR (2012) (71))

AU - Greenstein, Edward

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84876988992

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.comment???

AN - SCOPUS:84876988992

SN - 0098-9444

VL - 39

SP - 71

JO - Biblical Archaeology Review

JF - Biblical Archaeology Review

IS - 3

ER -