TY - JOUR
T1 - ERP indices of performance monitoring and feedback processing in psychosis
T2 - A meta-analysis
AU - Martin, Elizabeth A.
AU - McCleery, Amanda
AU - Moore, Melody M.
AU - Wynn, Jonathan K.
AU - Green, Michael F.
AU - Horan, William P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Background: Although individuals with, or at risk for, psychotic disorders often show difficulties with performance monitoring and feedback processing, findings from studies using event-related potentials (ERPs) to index these processes are not consistent. This meta-analytic review focused on studies of two different indexes of performance monitoring, the early error-related negativity (ERN; n = 25) and the later error positivity (Pe; n = 17), and one index of feedback processing, the feedback negativity (FN; n = 6). Methods: We evaluated whether individuals (1) with psychotic disorders, or (2) at heightened risk for these disorders differ from healthy controls in available studies of the ERN, Pe, and FN. Results: There was a significant, large ERN reduction in those with psychosis (g = −0.96) compared to controls, and a significant, moderate ERN reduction in those at-risk (g = −0.48). In contrast, there were uniformly non-significant, small between-group differences for Pe and FN (gs ≤ |0.16|). Conclusions: The results reveal a differential pattern of impairment in psychosis. Early performance monitoring (ERN) impairments are substantial among those with psychotic disorders in general and may be a useful vulnerability indicator for these disorders. However, later performance monitoring (Pe) and basic feedback processing (FN) appear to be relatively spared in psychosis.
AB - Background: Although individuals with, or at risk for, psychotic disorders often show difficulties with performance monitoring and feedback processing, findings from studies using event-related potentials (ERPs) to index these processes are not consistent. This meta-analytic review focused on studies of two different indexes of performance monitoring, the early error-related negativity (ERN; n = 25) and the later error positivity (Pe; n = 17), and one index of feedback processing, the feedback negativity (FN; n = 6). Methods: We evaluated whether individuals (1) with psychotic disorders, or (2) at heightened risk for these disorders differ from healthy controls in available studies of the ERN, Pe, and FN. Results: There was a significant, large ERN reduction in those with psychosis (g = −0.96) compared to controls, and a significant, moderate ERN reduction in those at-risk (g = −0.48). In contrast, there were uniformly non-significant, small between-group differences for Pe and FN (gs ≤ |0.16|). Conclusions: The results reveal a differential pattern of impairment in psychosis. Early performance monitoring (ERN) impairments are substantial among those with psychotic disorders in general and may be a useful vulnerability indicator for these disorders. However, later performance monitoring (Pe) and basic feedback processing (FN) appear to be relatively spared in psychosis.
KW - ERN
KW - Error positivity
KW - Error-related negativity
KW - FN
KW - Feedback-related negativity
KW - Pe
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051742862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.08.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.08.004
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 30102934
AN - SCOPUS:85051742862
SN - 0167-8760
VL - 132
SP - 365
EP - 378
JO - International Journal of Psychophysiology
JF - International Journal of Psychophysiology
ER -