Abstract
In the last two decades it has become increasingly common to ad-vocate for a complete ban on the sale of cigarettes. One reason in favor of such a ban is egalitarian: differences in the prevalence of smoking between socioeconomic groups go a long way in explaining health inequality, and a complete ban might be effective in reducing this inequality. However, a complete ban might also be objectionable on egalitarian grounds if issued with a discriminatory intent or if it is selectively paternalistic. This article argues that a complete ban is likely to be guilty of both, especially when one of its aims is to reduce unequal rates of smoking between groups. A complete ban on the sale of cigarettes thus exhibits a curious feature: in aiming to reduce inequality it threatens to be inegalitarian. This is characteristic of a wider class of public health policies that deserves further attention by egalitarians.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 91-113 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 by Johns Hopkins University Press.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- discriminatory intent
- egalitarian constraints
- health inequality
- pa-ternalistically egalitarian policies
- selective paternalism
- smoking
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Equality and a Complete Ban on the Sale of Cigarettes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver