Abstract
Since the mid-50s, induced abortion (IA) has been the principal method of birth control for as much as 80% of the U.S.S.R. population, with more than 9 million of terminations performed annually. After brief discussion of the general and specific reasons for a long-term IA dominance in family planning practices, data of the national statistics and local surveys on IA prevalence, contraceptive use and their determinants are critically reviewed. Although most couples are willing to use contraception, they have to rely on traditional methods with high failure rates (withdrawal, condom, rhythm/calendar). Due to many years of misleading information, population views on pros and cons of various birth control methods are severely biased. Public health implications of multiple IA are summarised.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 841-848 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Social Science and Medicine |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1991 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- attitudes
- contraceptive methods
- determinants
- induced abortion
- statistics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Epidemology and determinants of induced abortion in the U.S.S.R.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver