Empathy mitigates the relationship between ageism and subjective age in late life

Assaf Suberry, Ehud Bodner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study corresponds with a dispute in gerontology literature about whether a younger subjective age acts as a psychological defense for older adults by perceiving themselves as younger in order to dissociate from their age-group or as a marker of good physical health. This cross-sectional study presents a preliminary step to clarify this dispute. We examined the role of emotional empathy (measured by the Multifaceted Empathy Test) as a moderator in the ageism (measured implicitly by the Brief Implicit Association Test) and subjective age (measured on Likert scale) association on a convenience sample of 203 community-dwelling older adults (aged 65–90, M = 74.54, SD = 6.76). It was hypothesized that implicit ageism would be associated with younger subjective age and that this association would be only evident among older adults with lower emotional empathy. Implicit ageism was not associated with younger subjective age. As expected, hierarchical linear regression showed that the connection between higher implicit ageism and a younger subjective age remains significant (p = 0.012) only among participants with lower emotional empathy (∆R2 = 0.022, β = 0.156). Higher emotional empathy was associated with younger subjective age. For older adults who are equipped with the ability to feel others' emotions, the defensive dissociation between self and other perceptions of aging might be unnecessary. Theoretical and methodological implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101273
JournalJournal of Aging Studies
Volume71
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024

Keywords

  • Empathy
  • Implicit ageism
  • Internalization
  • Older adults
  • Subjective age

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Empathy mitigates the relationship between ageism and subjective age in late life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this