TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of skeletonized mesh implants for advanced pelvic organ prolapse
T2 - 12-month follow-up
AU - Weintraub, Adi Y.
AU - Neuman, Menahem
AU - Reuven, Yonatan
AU - Neymeyer, Joerg
AU - Marcus-Braun, Naama
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of skeletonized mesh implants for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: Women with advances POP underwent repair of stage III or greater anterior or posterior and apical compartment prolapse using skeletonized mesh implants (Seratom PA MR MN® system—SERAG-WIESSNER, Naila, Germany). Anatomical outcomes were assessed using pelvic organ prolapse quantification staging and functional outcomes were self-reported by the patients at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months. Anatomical and functional cure rates, post-operative pain and dyspareunia as well as intra and post-operative complications were reported. Success was defined as a composite of no bulge symptoms and no prolapse beyond the hymenal ring. Results: At 12 months, data were available for 103 of the 105 patients originally recruited. Intra-operative complications included 2 (2 %) cases of cystotomy that were corrected vaginally. The immediate post-operative complications included 1 patient (1 %) with UTI, 4 (3.9 %) cases of self-resolved hematomas, and 6 (5.8 %) cases of bladder outlet obstruction. At 12 months, a high success rate and low complication rate was noted. Recurrence of prolapse was reported by 7 (6.6 %) patients. However, only 4 (3.8 %) underwent a repeat procedure. Two patient developed de novo SUI, and 6 (5.7 %) developed dyspareunia. No cases of mesh erosion/extrusion were noted. Conclusion: The present study showed excellent anatomical and quality of life results in patients with advanced POP treated with a skeletonized and reduced mesh system. No mesh exposure was recorded within the first year after surgery.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of skeletonized mesh implants for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: Women with advances POP underwent repair of stage III or greater anterior or posterior and apical compartment prolapse using skeletonized mesh implants (Seratom PA MR MN® system—SERAG-WIESSNER, Naila, Germany). Anatomical outcomes were assessed using pelvic organ prolapse quantification staging and functional outcomes were self-reported by the patients at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months. Anatomical and functional cure rates, post-operative pain and dyspareunia as well as intra and post-operative complications were reported. Success was defined as a composite of no bulge symptoms and no prolapse beyond the hymenal ring. Results: At 12 months, data were available for 103 of the 105 patients originally recruited. Intra-operative complications included 2 (2 %) cases of cystotomy that were corrected vaginally. The immediate post-operative complications included 1 patient (1 %) with UTI, 4 (3.9 %) cases of self-resolved hematomas, and 6 (5.8 %) cases of bladder outlet obstruction. At 12 months, a high success rate and low complication rate was noted. Recurrence of prolapse was reported by 7 (6.6 %) patients. However, only 4 (3.8 %) underwent a repeat procedure. Two patient developed de novo SUI, and 6 (5.7 %) developed dyspareunia. No cases of mesh erosion/extrusion were noted. Conclusion: The present study showed excellent anatomical and quality of life results in patients with advanced POP treated with a skeletonized and reduced mesh system. No mesh exposure was recorded within the first year after surgery.
KW - Mesh augmentation
KW - Pelvic organ prolapse
KW - Sacrospinous ligament fixation
KW - Skeletonized mesh
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959079434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00345-016-1792-8
DO - 10.1007/s00345-016-1792-8
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 26906029
AN - SCOPUS:84959079434
SN - 0724-4983
VL - 34
SP - 1491
EP - 1498
JO - World Journal of Urology
JF - World Journal of Urology
IS - 10
ER -