TY - JOUR
T1 - Editorial to Part I “Revisioning, Rethinking, Restructuring Gender at Work
T2 - Quo Vadis Gender Stereotypes?”
AU - Hernandez Bark, Alina S.
AU - Junker, Nina M.
AU - Kark, Ronit
AU - Morgenroth, Thekla
AU - Peus, Claudia
AU - van Dick, Rolf
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - The papers in this Special Issue Part I “Revisioning, Rethinking, Restructuring Gender at Work: Quo Vadis Gender Stereotypes?” focus on the current state of gender inequality, particularly stereotypes. We present studies showing that differences in gender stereotypes still exist, confirm disadvantages for women in male-dominated roles and sectors and when the employment sector is not specified, but also disadvantages for men in female-dominated roles and sectors. In contrast to this general trend, one paper in Part II of this Special Issue found a preference for women over men as job candidates in their study. Incongruence emerged as a striking common theme to explain these gender differences, whereby some studies focused on the perceived incongruence from the actor's perspective and how external factors contribute to these perceptions, whereas others looked at the perceived incongruence from the observer's perspective. We summarize the papers and briefly discuss the key points of Part I at the end of this editorial.
AB - The papers in this Special Issue Part I “Revisioning, Rethinking, Restructuring Gender at Work: Quo Vadis Gender Stereotypes?” focus on the current state of gender inequality, particularly stereotypes. We present studies showing that differences in gender stereotypes still exist, confirm disadvantages for women in male-dominated roles and sectors and when the employment sector is not specified, but also disadvantages for men in female-dominated roles and sectors. In contrast to this general trend, one paper in Part II of this Special Issue found a preference for women over men as job candidates in their study. Incongruence emerged as a striking common theme to explain these gender differences, whereby some studies focused on the perceived incongruence from the actor's perspective and how external factors contribute to these perceptions, whereas others looked at the perceived incongruence from the observer's perspective. We summarize the papers and briefly discuss the key points of Part I at the end of this editorial.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133945225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jasp.12900
DO - 10.1111/jasp.12900
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85133945225
SN - 0021-9029
VL - 52
SP - 563
EP - 567
JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology
IS - 8
ER -