Editorial to Part I “Revisioning, Rethinking, Restructuring Gender at Work: Quo Vadis Gender Stereotypes?”

Alina S. Hernandez Bark, Nina M. Junker, Ronit Kark, Thekla Morgenroth, Claudia Peus, Rolf van Dick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The papers in this Special Issue Part I “Revisioning, Rethinking, Restructuring Gender at Work: Quo Vadis Gender Stereotypes?” focus on the current state of gender inequality, particularly stereotypes. We present studies showing that differences in gender stereotypes still exist, confirm disadvantages for women in male-dominated roles and sectors and when the employment sector is not specified, but also disadvantages for men in female-dominated roles and sectors. In contrast to this general trend, one paper in Part II of this Special Issue found a preference for women over men as job candidates in their study. Incongruence emerged as a striking common theme to explain these gender differences, whereby some studies focused on the perceived incongruence from the actor's perspective and how external factors contribute to these perceptions, whereas others looked at the perceived incongruence from the observer's perspective. We summarize the papers and briefly discuss the key points of Part I at the end of this editorial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)563-567
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume52
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Editorial to Part I “Revisioning, Rethinking, Restructuring Gender at Work: Quo Vadis Gender Stereotypes?”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this