Abstract
Background: Artificial gut models provide unique opportunities to study human-associated microbiota. Outstanding questions for these models' fundamental biology include the timescales on which microbiota vary and the factors that drive such change. Answering these questions though requires overcoming analytical obstacles like estimating the effects of technical variation on observed microbiota dynamics, as well as the lack of appropriate benchmark datasets. Results: To address these obstacles, we created a modeling framework based on multinomial logistic-normal dynamic linear models (MALLARDs) and performed dense longitudinal sampling of four replicate artificial human guts over the course of 1 month. The resulting analyses revealed how the ratio of biological variation to technical variation from sample processing depends on sampling frequency. In particular, we find that at hourly sampling frequencies, 76% of observed variation could be ascribed to technical sources, which could also skew the observed covariation between taxa. We also found that the artificial guts demonstrated replicable trajectories even after a recovery from a transient feed disruption. Additionally, we observed irregular sub-daily oscillatory dynamics associated with the bacterial family Enterobacteriaceae within all four replicate vessels. Conclusions: Our analyses suggest that, beyond variation due to sequence counting, technical variation from sample processing can obscure temporal variation from biological sources in artificial gut studies. Our analyses also supported hypotheses that human gut microbiota fluctuates on sub-daily timescales in the absence of a host and that microbiota can follow replicable trajectories in the presence of environmental driving forces. Finally, multiple aspects of our approach are generalizable and could ultimately be used to facilitate the design and analysis of longitudinal microbiota studies in vivo.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 202 |
Journal | Microbiome |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 12 Nov 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018 The Author(s).
Funding
JDS and LAD acknowledge support from the Duke University Medical Scientist Training Program (GM007171), the Global Probiotics Council, a Searle Scholars Award, the Hartwell Foundation, an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship, the Translational Research Institute through Cooperative Agreement NNX16AO69A, the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, the Hartwell Foundation, and NIH 1R01DK116187-01. SM would like to acknowledge the support of grants NSF IIS-1546331, NSF DMS-1418261, NSF IIS-1320357, NSF DMS-1045153, and NSF DMS1613261. We thank Rachel Silverman, Alex D. Washburne, Lionel Watkins, Firas Midani, Max Villa, Zachary Holmes, Brianna Petrone, B. Jesse Shapiro, Jonathan Friedman, and Susan Holmes for their manuscript comments and insights. This work used a high-performance computing facility partially supported by grant 2016-IDG-1013 (“HARDAC+: Reproducible HPC for Next-generation Genomics”) from the North Carolina Biotechnology Center.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Global Probiotics Council | |
National Science Foundation | IIS-1546331, DMS-1418261, DMS-1045153, DMS1613261, IIS-1320357 |
National Institutes of Health | |
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases | R01DK116187 |
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation | |
Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation | |
North Carolina Biotechnology Center | |
Duke University | GM007171 |
Hartwell Foundation | |
Translational Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences | NNX16AO69A |
Keywords
- Artificial gut
- Bayesian statistics
- Bioreactor
- Compositional data
- Metagenomics
- Microbiome
- Time series analysis