Abstract
Firms may misreport income or fail to comply with environmental regulations. This study contributes to the growing literature that analyzes dynamic history-dependent compliance monitoring, under which penalties or monitoring frequency are selected on the basis of recent compliance history. The current study develops methods for evaluating and comparing explicit solutions under given monitoring costs and income distributions, using a commonplace utility-penalty scenario under which firms never comply fully with regulations if statically monitored (regardless of their income distribution), but find it to their benefit, if dynamically monitored, to comply fully when their income is sufficiently high. In most examples tried, dynamic monitoring is superior even when constrained to monitor all firms at rates below the optimal static rate. The model is applied to actual IRS 2010 tax-report monitoring and compliance data partitioned by income bracket. This allows, in particular, to deduce degrees of risk aversion.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 469-495 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | Annals of Operations Research |
Volume | 334 |
Issue number | 1-3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2022.
Funding
The research of Perlman and Meilijson was supported in part by the Israel Science Foundation grant No. 1898/21.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Israel Science Foundation | 1898/21 |
Keywords
- CARA utility
- Compliance monitoring
- Environmental regulation
- Tax evasion