Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Does it Pay to Work for Free? Negative Selection and the Wage Returns to Volunteer Experience

  • University of St. Gallen
  • Bangor University
  • Royal Holloway University of London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper offers the first instrumental variables estimates of the wage returns to volunteer experience. The returns are substantial and differ considerably by gender. The results imply that the unequal valuation of volunteer experience by gender is more important in explaining the gender earnings gap than is the unequal valuation of part-time paid work experience. The results also indicate negative selection into unpaid work. In a simple model of optimal volunteering, negative selection implies that a lower cost of volunteering would produce both an expanded and higher-skilled pool of volunteers, and greater societal benefits from volunteer work.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1018-1045
Number of pages28
JournalOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Volume79
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Department of Economics, University of Oxford and John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does it Pay to Work for Free? Negative Selection and the Wage Returns to Volunteer Experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this