TY - GEN
T1 - Distributed algorithms for network diameter and girth
AU - Peleg, David
AU - Roditty, Liam
AU - Tal, Elad
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - This paper considers the problem of computing the diameter D and the girth g of an n-node network in the CONGEST distributed model. In this model, in each synchronous round, each vertex can transmit a different short (say, O(logn) bits) message to each of its neighbors. We present a distributed algorithm that computes the diameter of the network in O(n) rounds. We also present two distributed approximation algorithms. The first computes a 2/3 multiplicative approximation of the diameter in rounds. The second computes a 2∈-∈1/g multiplicative approximation of the girth in rounds. Recently, Frischknecht, Holzer and Wattenhofer [11] considered these problems in the CONGEST model but from the perspective of lower bounds. They showed an rounds lower bound for exact diameter computation. For diameter approximation, they showed a lower bound of rounds for getting a multiplicative approximation of. Both lower bounds hold for networks with constant diameter. For girth approximation, they showed a lower bound of rounds for getting a multiplicative approximation of on a network with constant girth. Our exact algorithm for computing the diameter matches their lower bound. Our diameter and girth approximation algorithms almost match their lower bounds for constant diameter and for constant girth.
AB - This paper considers the problem of computing the diameter D and the girth g of an n-node network in the CONGEST distributed model. In this model, in each synchronous round, each vertex can transmit a different short (say, O(logn) bits) message to each of its neighbors. We present a distributed algorithm that computes the diameter of the network in O(n) rounds. We also present two distributed approximation algorithms. The first computes a 2/3 multiplicative approximation of the diameter in rounds. The second computes a 2∈-∈1/g multiplicative approximation of the girth in rounds. Recently, Frischknecht, Holzer and Wattenhofer [11] considered these problems in the CONGEST model but from the perspective of lower bounds. They showed an rounds lower bound for exact diameter computation. For diameter approximation, they showed a lower bound of rounds for getting a multiplicative approximation of. Both lower bounds hold for networks with constant diameter. For girth approximation, they showed a lower bound of rounds for getting a multiplicative approximation of on a network with constant girth. Our exact algorithm for computing the diameter matches their lower bound. Our diameter and girth approximation algorithms almost match their lower bounds for constant diameter and for constant girth.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84884186295
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-31585-5_58
DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-31585-5_58
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.conference???
AN - SCOPUS:84884186295
SN - 9783642315848
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 660
EP - 672
BT - Automata, Languages, and Programming - 39th International Colloquium, ICALP 2012, Proceedings
PB - Springer Verlag
T2 - 39th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2012
Y2 - 9 July 2012 through 13 July 2012
ER -