TY - JOUR
T1 - Distinguishing tubal rupture from tubal abortion in ectopic pregnancies after methotrexate treatment
T2 - a retrospective cohort study
AU - Darwish, Asal
AU - avishalom, Sharon
AU - Sgayer, Inshirah
AU - Mikhail, Susana Mustafa
AU - Lowenstein, Lior
AU - Aiob, Ala
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/6/5
Y1 - 2025/6/5
N2 - Purpose: To identify clinical, sonographic, and laboratory characteristics that distinguish between tubal rupture and tubal abortion following methotrexate (MTX) treatment for ectopic pregnancy (EP) and to compare the morbidity associated with these 2 outcomes. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included women treated with MTX for EP at Galilee Medical Center between 2012 and 2024. Data on clinical presentation, ultrasound findings, and laboratory values were analyzed. Uregint surgical interventions were classified as tubal rupture or tubal abortion based on intraoperative findings. A comparative analysis between these groups was performed, and multivariable modeling was used to identify predictors of tubal rupture. Results: Among 280 women treated with MTX, 47 (16.7%) required urgent surgical intervention. Of these, 15 (34.9%) were confirmed as tubal rupture, while 28 (65.1%) were tubal abortion. Women with tubal rupture more frequently presented with free pelvic fluid on transvaginal ultrasound (64.3 vs. 28.6%, P = 0.045) and had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (433 ± 143 mL vs. 250 ± 201 mL, P = 0.001). A multivariable logistic regression model identified free pelvic fluid as an independent predictor of tubal rupture (odds ratio: 6.09, 95% CI 1.23–30.09, P = 0.027). No significant differences in preoperative beta-hCG levels or other clinical symptoms were observed between the groups. Conclusion: Tubal rupture and tubal abortion share overlapping clinical features, making differentiation with current diagnostic tools challenging. Free pelvic fluid on ultrasound is a significant indicator of tubal rupture, underscoring the importance of timely surgical intervention. Recognizing that tubal abortion may be a self-limiting condition in some cases offers opportunities to preserve fallopian tube integrity and reduce unnecessary surgeries. Further research is needed to improve diagnostic accuracy and explore conservative management strategies for tubal abortion. Date and number of trial registration: December 2024, 0138–24-NHR.
AB - Purpose: To identify clinical, sonographic, and laboratory characteristics that distinguish between tubal rupture and tubal abortion following methotrexate (MTX) treatment for ectopic pregnancy (EP) and to compare the morbidity associated with these 2 outcomes. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included women treated with MTX for EP at Galilee Medical Center between 2012 and 2024. Data on clinical presentation, ultrasound findings, and laboratory values were analyzed. Uregint surgical interventions were classified as tubal rupture or tubal abortion based on intraoperative findings. A comparative analysis between these groups was performed, and multivariable modeling was used to identify predictors of tubal rupture. Results: Among 280 women treated with MTX, 47 (16.7%) required urgent surgical intervention. Of these, 15 (34.9%) were confirmed as tubal rupture, while 28 (65.1%) were tubal abortion. Women with tubal rupture more frequently presented with free pelvic fluid on transvaginal ultrasound (64.3 vs. 28.6%, P = 0.045) and had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (433 ± 143 mL vs. 250 ± 201 mL, P = 0.001). A multivariable logistic regression model identified free pelvic fluid as an independent predictor of tubal rupture (odds ratio: 6.09, 95% CI 1.23–30.09, P = 0.027). No significant differences in preoperative beta-hCG levels or other clinical symptoms were observed between the groups. Conclusion: Tubal rupture and tubal abortion share overlapping clinical features, making differentiation with current diagnostic tools challenging. Free pelvic fluid on ultrasound is a significant indicator of tubal rupture, underscoring the importance of timely surgical intervention. Recognizing that tubal abortion may be a self-limiting condition in some cases offers opportunities to preserve fallopian tube integrity and reduce unnecessary surgeries. Further research is needed to improve diagnostic accuracy and explore conservative management strategies for tubal abortion. Date and number of trial registration: December 2024, 0138–24-NHR.
KW - Beta-hCG
KW - Fallopian tube preservation
KW - Free pelvic fluid
KW - Predictive factors
KW - Surgical intervention
KW - Transvaginal ultrasound
KW - Tubal abortion
KW - Tubal rupture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105007332649&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00404-025-08069-5
DO - 10.1007/s00404-025-08069-5
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 40471283
AN - SCOPUS:105007332649
SN - 0932-0067
JO - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
JF - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
ER -