Abstract
Both adjuvants and focal ablation can alter the local innate immune system and trigger a highly effective systemic response. Our goal is to determine the impact of these treatments on directly treated and distant disease and the mechanisms for the enhanced response obtained by combinatorial treatments. Methods: We combined RNA-sequencing, flow cytometry and TCR-sequencing to dissect the impact of immunotherapy and of immunotherapy combined with ablation on local and systemic immune components. Results: With administration of a TLR agonist (CpG) alone or CpG combined with same-site ablation, we found dramatic differences between the local and distant tumor environments, where the directly treated tumors were skewed to high expression of F4/80, Cd11b and Tnf and the distant tumors to enhanced Cd11c, Cd3 and Ifng. When ablation was added to immunotherapy, 100% (n=20/20) of directly treated tumors and 90% (n=18/20) of distant tumors were responsive. Comparing the combined ablation-immunotherapy treatment to immunotherapy alone, we find three major mechanistic differences. First, while ablation alone enhanced intratumoral antigen cross-presentation (up to ~8% of CD45+ cells), systemic cross-presentation of tumor antigen remained low. Combining same-site ablation with CpG amplified cross-presentation in the draining lymph node (~16% of CD45+ cells) compared to the ablation-only (~0.1% of CD45+ cells) and immunotherapy-only cohorts (~10% of CD45+ cells). Macrophages and DCs process and present this antigen to CD8+ T-cells, increasing the number of unique T-cell receptor rearrangements in distant tumors. Second, type 1 interferon (IFN) release from tumor cells increased with the ablation-immunotherapy treatment as compared with ablation or immunotherapy alone. Type 1 IFN release is synergistic with toll-like receptor activation in enhancing cytokine and chemokine expression. Expression of genes associated with T-cell activation and stimulation (Eomes, Prf1 and Icos) was 27, 56 and 89-fold higher with ablation-immunotherapy treatment as compared to the no treatment controls (and 12, 32 and 60-fold, respectively, compared with immunotherapy alone). Third, we found that the ablation-immunotherapy treatment polarized macrophages and dendritic cells towards a CD169 subset systemically, where CD169+ macrophages are an IFN-enhanced subpopulation associated with dead-cell antigen presentation. Conclusion: While the local and distant responses are distinct, CpG combined with ablative focal therapy drives a highly effective systemic immune response.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3611-3628 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Theranostics |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 13 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Ivyspring International Publisher.
Funding
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Focused Ultrasound Foundation and National Institutes of Health (NIH) NIHR01CA199658, NIHR01 CA211602, NIHR01CA210553, and NIHR01CA134 659. Real-time quantitative TaqMan PCR assays were performed by the UCD, Real-time PCR Research and Diagnostics Core Facility with technical assistance from Ms. Edlin Escobar and Dr. Emir Hodzic. This project is also supported by the University of California Davis Flow Cytometry Shared Resource Laboratory with funding from the NCI P30 CA093373 (Cancer Center), and NIH NCRR C06-RR12088, S10 OD018223, S10 RR12964 and S10 RR 026825 grants and with technical assistance from Ms. Bridget McLaughlin and Mr. Jonathan Van Dyke. The UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center Genomics Shared Resource is supported by Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA093373) from the National Cancer Institute We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Focused Ultrasound Foundation and National Institutes of Health (NIH) NIHR01CA199658, NIHR01 CA211602, NIHR01CA210553, and NIHR01CA134 659. Real-time quantitative TaqMan PCR assays were performed by the UCD, Real-time PCR Research and Diagnostics Core Facility with technical assistance from Ms. Edlin Escobar and Dr. Emir Hodzic. This project is also supported by the University of California Davis Flow Cytometry Shared Resource Laboratory with funding from the NCI P30 CA093373 (Cancer Center), and NIH NCRR C06-RR12088, S10 OD018223, S10 RR12964 and S10 RR 026825 grants and with technical assistance from Ms. Bridget McLaughlin and Mr. Jonathan Van Dyke. The UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center Genomics Shared Resource is supported by Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA093373) from the National Cancer Institute.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
NCI P30 CA093373 | |
NIH NCRR | C06-RR12088, S10 OD018223, S10 RR 026825, S10 RR12964 |
NIH NCRR C06-RR12088 | NCRR C06-RR12088 |
Research | |
UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center Genomics Shared Resource | |
University of California Davis Flow Cytometry Shared Resource Laboratory | |
National Institutes of Health | NIHR01CA210553, NIHR01 CA211602, NIHR01CA134 659 |
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health | |
National Cancer Institute | R01CA199658, P30 CA093373 |
Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine | |
Focused Ultrasound Foundation | |
University of California, Davis | |
University College Dublin |
Keywords
- Ablation
- Immunotherapy
- RNA sequencing
- T-cell receptor sequencing
- Ultrasound