Abstract
We describe a new technique for designing more accurate admissible heuristic evaluation functions, based on pattern databases [J. Culberson, J. Schaeffer, Comput. Intelligence 14 (3) (1998) 318-334]. While many heuristics, such as Manhattan distance, compute the cost of solving individual subgoals independently, pattern databases consider the cost of solving multiple subgoals simultaneously. Existing work on pattern databases allows combining values from different pattern databases by taking their maximum. If the subgoals can be divided into disjoint subsets so that each operator only affects subgoals in one subset, then we can add the pattern-database values for each subset, resulting in a more accurate admissible heuristic function. We used this technique to improve performance on the Fifteen Puzzle by a factor of over 2000, and to find optimal solutions to 50 random instances of the Twenty-Four Puzzle.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 9-22 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Artificial Intelligence |
Volume | 134 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2002 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by NSF Grant IRI-9619447. Thanks to Eitan Yarden and Moshe Malin for their work on pairwise and triple distances.
Funding
This work was supported by NSF Grant IRI-9619447. Thanks to Eitan Yarden and Moshe Malin for their work on pairwise and triple distances.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
National Science Foundation | IRI-9619447 |
Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering | 9619447 |
Keywords
- Fifteen Puzzle
- Heuristic evaluation functions
- Heuristic search
- Pattern databases
- Problem solving
- Rubik's Cube
- Single-agent search
- Sliding-tile puzzles
- Twenty-Four Puzzle