Disease management plus recommended care versus recommended care alone for ambulatory patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Ofra Kalter-Leibovici, Michal Benderly, Laurence S. Freedman, Galit Kaufman, Tchiya Molcho Falkenberg Luft, Havi Murad, Liraz Olmer, Meri Gluch, David Segev, Avi Gilad, Said Elkrinawi, Tali Cukierman-Yaffe, Baruch Chen, Orit Jacobson, Calanit Key, Mordechai Shani, Gershon Fink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rationale: The efficacy of disease management programs in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains uncertain. Objectives: To study the effect of disease management (DM) added to recommended care (RC) in ambulatory patients with COPD. Measurements and Main Results: In this trial, 1,202 patients with COPD (age,>40 yr), with moderate to very severe airflow limitation were randomly assigned either to DM plus RC (study intervention) or to RC alone (control intervention). RC included follow-up by pulmonologists, inhaled long-Acting bronchodilators and corticosteroids, smoking cessation intervention, nutritional advice and psychosocial support when indicated, and supervised physical activity sessions. DM, delivered by trained nurses during patients' visits to the designated COPD centers and by remote contacts with the patients between these visits, included patient self-care education, monitoring patients' symptoms and adherence to treatment, provision of advice in case of acute disease exacerbation, and coordination of care vis-á-vis other healthcare providers. The primary composite endpoint was first hospital admission for respiratory symptoms or death from any cause. During 3,537 patientyears, 284 patients (47.2%) in the control group and 264 (44.0%) in the study intervention group had a primary endpoint event. The median (range) time elapsed until a primary endpoint event was 1.0 (0-4.0) years among patients assigned to the study intervention and 1.1 (0-4.1) years among patients assigned to the control intervention; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.08). Conclusions:DMadded toRCwas not superior toRCalone in delaying first hospital admission or death among ambulatory patients with COPD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1565-1574
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume197
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 by the American Thoracic Society.

Funding

Supported by the Medical Research Infrastructure Development and Health Services Fund by the Sheba Medical Center (Tel-Hashomer, Israel). The funder approved the study protocol but had no role in the study design, data analysis, or manuscript preparation and submission.

FundersFunder number
Sheba Medical Center

    Keywords

    • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    • Disease management
    • Hospitalization(s)
    • Mortality
    • Pulmonary rehabilitation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Disease management plus recommended care versus recommended care alone for ambulatory patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this