Did David actually conquer Jerusalem? the blind, the lame, and the Sinnôr

Jonathan Grossman

doi:10.1163/15685330-12341342

Did David actually conquer Jerusalem? the blind, the lame, and the Sinnôr

Jonathan Grossman

The Department of Hebrew Bible at Bar-Ilan University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

One of the most cryptic narratives in Samuel is the story of David's conquest of the city of Jebus-Jerusalem. This paper proposes that David did not conquer the city through battle, but through the Jebusites' peaceful surrender. This understanding illuminates the meaning of the obscure reference to "the blind and the lame," as well as the word "innôr."

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	46-59
Number of pages	14
Journal	Vetus Testamentum
Volume	69
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-12341342
State	Published - 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Keywords

David
Innôr
Jebus
Jerusalem
The blind and the lame

Access to Document

10.1163/15685330-12341342

Cite this

@article{5e96bbd29741447698b6134084e08aab,

title = "Did David actually conquer Jerusalem? the blind, the lame, and the Sinn{\^o}r",

abstract = "One of the most cryptic narratives in Samuel is the story of David's conquest of the city of Jebus-Jerusalem. This paper proposes that David did not conquer the city through battle, but through the Jebusites' peaceful surrender. This understanding illuminates the meaning of the obscure reference to {"}the blind and the lame,{"} as well as the word {"}inn{\^o}r.{"}",

keywords = "David, Inn{\^o}r, Jebus, Jerusalem, The blind and the lame",

author = "Jonathan Grossman",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1163/15685330-12341342",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "69",

pages = "46--59",

journal = "Vetus Testamentum",

issn = "0042-4935",

publisher = "Brill Academic Publishers",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Did David actually conquer Jerusalem? the blind, the lame, and the Sinnôr

AU - Grossman, Jonathan

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - One of the most cryptic narratives in Samuel is the story of David's conquest of the city of Jebus-Jerusalem. This paper proposes that David did not conquer the city through battle, but through the Jebusites' peaceful surrender. This understanding illuminates the meaning of the obscure reference to "the blind and the lame," as well as the word "innôr."

AB - One of the most cryptic narratives in Samuel is the story of David's conquest of the city of Jebus-Jerusalem. This paper proposes that David did not conquer the city through battle, but through the Jebusites' peaceful surrender. This understanding illuminates the meaning of the obscure reference to "the blind and the lame," as well as the word "innôr."

KW - David

KW - Innôr

KW - Jebus

KW - Jerusalem

KW - The blind and the lame

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060828321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/15685330-12341342

DO - 10.1163/15685330-12341342

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???

SN - 0042-4935

VL - 69

SP - 46

EP - 59

JO - Vetus Testamentum

JF - Vetus Testamentum

IS - 1

ER -

Did David actually conquer Jerusalem? the blind, the lame, and the Sinnôr

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this