Abstract
Recent literature has established that financial disruption has real costs which justify government intervention in the financial sector. One form of government intervention is deposit insurance. In this paper we determine the optimal pricing and subsidy of deposit insurance in a social welfare context. The main conclusion is that optimal deposit insurance need not be actuarially fair. In an economy with a real and a financial sector we consider the effects of taxation and social (political) weights of the sectors. We analyze two policy tools: government supervision and deposit insurance pricing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 531-552 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Banking and Finance |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 1994 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Correspondence to: Y. Landskroner, School of Business Administration, sity of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel 91905. *We would like to thank Linda Allen, Mitch Berlin, Tony Santomero and especially Tony Saunders and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. This study was supported by the Krueger Center for Finance at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. ‘For an overview article on the linkage between the financial system and aggregate economic activity see Gertler (1988).
Funding
Correspondence to: Y. Landskroner, School of Business Administration, sity of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel 91905. *We would like to thank Linda Allen, Mitch Berlin, Tony Santomero and especially Tony Saunders and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. This study was supported by the Krueger Center for Finance at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. ‘For an overview article on the linkage between the financial system and aggregate economic activity see Gertler (1988).
| Funders |
|---|
| Krueger Center for Finance |
Keywords
- Banks regulation
- Banks supervision
- Deposit insurance
- Social welfare