‘Decision not to decide’: a new challenge for planning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article examines how the policy-maker’s ‘decision not to decide’ affects different levels of internal organization and how it is reflected in the residential patterns of different population groups. The article explores the dynamics of residential patterns in two case studies: the Collective behaviour of the Sylheti community along Whitechapel Road in Eastern London and the Group Action of the ‘Kol-Torah’ Community in Zangwill Street, Jerusalem, where Inner-markets activities create clear property lines around/within their boundaries and result in a similar homogeneous pattern. Identifying the main engines of organized neighbourhood change and the difficulties of planning and dealing with individuals in the housing market shed light on similar processes occurring in other city centres with diverse population groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1076-1098
Number of pages23
JournalEuropean Planning Studies
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Jun 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Funding

This research was carried out under a Marie Curie Fellowship [PIEF-GA-2012-328820] while based at the Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA) University College London (UCL), supervised by Prof. Michael Batty. The writing up has been supported by The Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) grant Survey of London: Whitechapel Initiative, based in the Bartlett School of Architecture and CASA, University College London [R24 AH/N00146X/1].

FundersFunder number
Bartlett School of ArchitectureR24 AH/N00146X/1
Arts and Humanities Research Council

    Keywords

    • Haredi
    • Inaction
    • Sylheti
    • collective behaviour
    • decision not to decide
    • group action
    • planning

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '‘Decision not to decide’: a new challenge for planning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this