TY - JOUR
T1 - Decision-making in the colposcopy clinic - A critical analysis
AU - Bornstein, Jacob
AU - Yaakov, Zvi
AU - Pascal, Bruno
AU - Faktor, Joseph
AU - Baram, Amiram
AU - Zarfati, Doron
AU - Abramovici, Haim
PY - 1999/8
Y1 - 1999/8
N2 - Objective: To consider the omission of several diagnostic steps from the management of patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) by analyzing the role of each step on the choice of treatment. Study design: Each diagnostic procedure was correlated to the treatment and outcome in 87 women with high-grade SIL. Treatments considered were large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ), cold knife conization, and CO 2 laser vaporization. Results: Unsatisfactory colposcopy (P≤0.01) and positive endocervical curettage (ECC) specimen (P≤0.01) were essential for choice of treatment. CIN2 diagnoses of the preoperative cervical biopsy were rediagnosed as CIN3 based on the surgical specimen in 57% of the cases. The margins of 33 and 23% of surgical specimens removed by LLETZ or knife conization, respectively, displayed CIN involvement. Forty and 47% of these patients, respectively, later developed recurrent CIN. Conclusions: Omission of colposcopy and ECC could have resulted in sub-optimal treatment in many cases. Excision by LLETZ or knife conization is recommended for cases of CIN2 and CIN3. Follow up is imperative for patients with involvement of the margins. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.
AB - Objective: To consider the omission of several diagnostic steps from the management of patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) by analyzing the role of each step on the choice of treatment. Study design: Each diagnostic procedure was correlated to the treatment and outcome in 87 women with high-grade SIL. Treatments considered were large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ), cold knife conization, and CO 2 laser vaporization. Results: Unsatisfactory colposcopy (P≤0.01) and positive endocervical curettage (ECC) specimen (P≤0.01) were essential for choice of treatment. CIN2 diagnoses of the preoperative cervical biopsy were rediagnosed as CIN3 based on the surgical specimen in 57% of the cases. The margins of 33 and 23% of surgical specimens removed by LLETZ or knife conization, respectively, displayed CIN involvement. Forty and 47% of these patients, respectively, later developed recurrent CIN. Conclusions: Omission of colposcopy and ECC could have resulted in sub-optimal treatment in many cases. Excision by LLETZ or knife conization is recommended for cases of CIN2 and CIN3. Follow up is imperative for patients with involvement of the margins. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.
KW - CO laser
KW - Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
KW - Colposcopy
KW - Loop conization
KW - Squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033181067&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00026-3
DO - 10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00026-3
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 10584639
AN - SCOPUS:0033181067
SN - 0301-2115
VL - 85
SP - 219
EP - 224
JO - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
JF - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
IS - 2
ER -