TY - JOUR
T1 - Crowdsourcing approaches for knowledge organization systems
T2 - Crowd collaboration or crowd work?
AU - Zhitomirsky-Geffet, Maayan
AU - Kwaśnik, Barbara H.
AU - Bullard, Julia
AU - Hajibayova, Lala
AU - Hamari, Juho
AU - Bowman, Timothy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 by Association for Information Science and Technology
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Development of Internet technologies has empowered ordinary users to create, contribute, share and connect with other members of the community. As users learn to exploit the potential of networked communications, they participate in a process, which facilitates a shift from individual to collective contributions and introduces an opportunity for multi-vocal and multi-faceted representation of cultural heritage. Open access to crowdsourced collections requires reconsideration of the traditional authoritative approach of cultural heritage institutions. The arduous nature of the work rendered voluntarily in cultural heritage crowdsourcing initiatives calls for reconsideration of power relationships and giving power to devoted contributors supported by modern “intelligent” technology to regulate the process of representation and organization. Taking into consideration the fact that crowdsourced data are not without flaws, the question is how to better utilize the collective intelligence to create quality information. In this context, various issues such as power, control, trust, inter-contributor consensus, heterogeneity of opinions will be raised and discussed by the panelists. Each of the panelists comes from a different field of expertise (Computer science, Information science, Economics, Communication studies, cultural heritage) and various cultural backgrounds and geographical locations (United States, Europe and Israel). This diversity will be reflected in the presented perspectives on the crowdsourcing topic.
AB - Development of Internet technologies has empowered ordinary users to create, contribute, share and connect with other members of the community. As users learn to exploit the potential of networked communications, they participate in a process, which facilitates a shift from individual to collective contributions and introduces an opportunity for multi-vocal and multi-faceted representation of cultural heritage. Open access to crowdsourced collections requires reconsideration of the traditional authoritative approach of cultural heritage institutions. The arduous nature of the work rendered voluntarily in cultural heritage crowdsourcing initiatives calls for reconsideration of power relationships and giving power to devoted contributors supported by modern “intelligent” technology to regulate the process of representation and organization. Taking into consideration the fact that crowdsourced data are not without flaws, the question is how to better utilize the collective intelligence to create quality information. In this context, various issues such as power, control, trust, inter-contributor consensus, heterogeneity of opinions will be raised and discussed by the panelists. Each of the panelists comes from a different field of expertise (Computer science, Information science, Economics, Communication studies, cultural heritage) and various cultural backgrounds and geographical locations (United States, Europe and Israel). This diversity will be reflected in the presented perspectives on the crowdsourcing topic.
KW - collaborative knowledge organization
KW - crowd collaboration
KW - crowd work
KW - crowdsourcing
KW - ontologies
KW - wisdom of crowds
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015335785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301013
DO - 10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301013
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
SN - 2373-9231
VL - 53
SP - 1
EP - 6
JO - Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
JF - Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
IS - 1
ER -