Abstract
What is it for a picture to be more realistic, or more depictive, than another? Without committing to any thesis as to what depiction consists in, I show that degrees of depictiveness are grounded in a certain relation between two basic kinds of differences between pictures: configurational differences and content differences. A picture is thus more depictive just in case it is seen as having fewer nondepictive features, whereas a nondepictive feature is individuated through the susceptibility of the picture's configuration to change without entailing any change in the picture's content.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 375-405 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Philosophical Studies |
| Volume | 135 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Content-free pictorial realism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver