Abstract
This article offers a conceptual framework of Facebook’s sub-platforms: Profiles, Groups, and Pages. We demonstrate the crucially different affordances that these sub-platforms possess, and the various resulting social practices and dynamics that they enable. With mourning and memorialization as a case study, our findings point at emergent practices ranging along a personal-to-public spectrum of communicative functions and media uses: Profiles offer a personal quality, albeit differently for the bereaved’s Profile and the deceased’s Profile; Groups possess a hybrid nature, combining self-expression alongside public aspects, reviving thus premodern bereaved communities; and Pages possess a distinctly public quality, serving as online memorialization centers where the deceased becomes an icon and a resource for mobilizing broad social change. This comparative and integrated approach may be applied productively to other contexts and other social media (sub-)platforms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2898-2917 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | New Media and Society |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2021.
Keywords
- Affordances
- discourse analysis
- memorialization
- mourning
- participation
- qualitative research
- social media
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptualizing social media sub-platforms: The case of mourning and memorialization practices on Facebook'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver