COMPONENTS OF ARTIFACTUAL VARIANCE IN META‐ANALYTIC RESEARCH

MENI KOSLOWSKY, ABRAHAM SAGIE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Except for a few rough estimates, the literature contains no precise data on the relative size of each correctable artifact in a meta‐analysis. The purpose of the present study was to determine these proportions and see if artifacts were related to various sample and subpopulation parameters. The study confirmed the notion that sampling error accounts for the bulk of the total artifactual variance (i.e., more than 90% for small or medium samples and more than 70% for large samples, e.g., N = 500). Nevertheless, variation in the percentages of each artifact was found to be primarily a function of sample size and mean correlation. Total artifactual variance was found to be a function of subpopulation correlation differences and sample size. Practical implications of the results are presented.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)561-574
Number of pages14
JournalPersonnel Psychology
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1994

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'COMPONENTS OF ARTIFACTUAL VARIANCE IN META‐ANALYTIC RESEARCH'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this