TY - JOUR
T1 - Complete Transesophageal Assessment of the Aortic Valve Using the Continuity Equation in Equivocal Cases of Aortic Stenosis
AU - Moady, Gassan
AU - Serhan, Moanis
AU - Atar, Shaul
AU - Shturman, Alexander
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Israel Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - Background: The continuity equation (CE) used for evaluating aortic stenosis (AS) is based on values obtained from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with the assumption that the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) has a circular shape. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may be used for accurate measurement of the LVOT cross-sectional area (CSA). Previous studies have focused on fusion from TEE for LVOT-CSA measurement and TTE for velocity time integrals (VTI) calculations.Objectives: To assess aortic valve area (AVA) using parameters obtained exclusively from TEE as an alternative approach.Methods: Thirty patients with equivocal AS based on TTE were evaluated using TEE for further assessment. Results: The mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve (AV) was 38 ± 5.9 and 37.9 ± 7.6 mmHg in TTE and TEE, respectively, P = 0.42. LVOT-CSA was larger in TEE (3.6 ± 0.3 vs. 3.4 ± 0.3 cm2, P = 0.049). VTI over the AVA was similar (98.54 ± 22.8 and 99.52 ± 24.52 cm in TTE and TEE, respectively, P = 0.608), while VTI across the LVOT was higher when measured by TTE (24.06 ± 5.8 vs. 22.03 ± 4.3 cm, P < 0.009). Using the CE, AVA was 0.82 ± 0.3 vs. 0.83 ±0.17 cm2 in TEE vs. TTE, respectively, P = 0.608. Definitive grading was achieved in all patients (26 patients defined with severe AS and 4 with moderate). Conclusions: In equivocal cases of AS, full assessment using TEE may be a reliable modality for decision making.
AB - Background: The continuity equation (CE) used for evaluating aortic stenosis (AS) is based on values obtained from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with the assumption that the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) has a circular shape. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may be used for accurate measurement of the LVOT cross-sectional area (CSA). Previous studies have focused on fusion from TEE for LVOT-CSA measurement and TTE for velocity time integrals (VTI) calculations.Objectives: To assess aortic valve area (AVA) using parameters obtained exclusively from TEE as an alternative approach.Methods: Thirty patients with equivocal AS based on TTE were evaluated using TEE for further assessment. Results: The mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve (AV) was 38 ± 5.9 and 37.9 ± 7.6 mmHg in TTE and TEE, respectively, P = 0.42. LVOT-CSA was larger in TEE (3.6 ± 0.3 vs. 3.4 ± 0.3 cm2, P = 0.049). VTI over the AVA was similar (98.54 ± 22.8 and 99.52 ± 24.52 cm in TTE and TEE, respectively, P = 0.608), while VTI across the LVOT was higher when measured by TTE (24.06 ± 5.8 vs. 22.03 ± 4.3 cm, P < 0.009). Using the CE, AVA was 0.82 ± 0.3 vs. 0.83 ±0.17 cm2 in TEE vs. TTE, respectively, P = 0.608. Definitive grading was achieved in all patients (26 patients defined with severe AS and 4 with moderate). Conclusions: In equivocal cases of AS, full assessment using TEE may be a reliable modality for decision making.
KW - aortic stenosis (AS)
KW - continuity equation (CE)
KW - echocardiography
KW - pressure
KW - velocity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177442751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 37980620
AN - SCOPUS:85177442751
SN - 1565-1088
VL - 25
SP - 747
EP - 751
JO - Israel Medical Association Journal
JF - Israel Medical Association Journal
IS - 11
ER -