TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of blood pressure measurements on the bare arm, below a rolled-up sleeve, or over a sleeve
AU - Kahan, Ernesto
AU - Yaphe, John
AU - Knaani-Levinz, Hadas
AU - Weingarten, Michael A.
PY - 2003/12
Y1 - 2003/12
N2 - Background. This study examined the effect of measuring blood pressure below subjects' rolled-up sleeves, over the sleeve, or on the bare arm. This is an important day-to-day issue for the busy GP. Methods. The sample consisted of 201 subjects in family practice clinics and residents of a senior citizens' home. A digital device was used in all cases. Each participant underwent three blood pressure measurements in each of the following conditions in random order: cuff on bare arm; cuff over the sleeve; and cuff below the rolled-up sleeve. Differences between measurements were plotted against the mean blood pressure. Confounding factors controlled for were age, sex, clothing pressure and skin-fold thickness. Results. Differences in mean blood pressure readings between the clothed and bare arm were 0.5 mmHg (SD 7.5) for systolic pressure and 1 mmHg (SD 5) for diastolic pressure; neither difference was significant. However, in hypertensive subjects (>140 mmHg systolic), although the mean difference remained small (systolic pressure, 2 mmHg, SD 10), the range of difference for individual subjects was -32 mmHg to +22 mmHg. Conclusion. The degree of clothing under the sphygmomanometer cuff does not have a clinically important effect on the blood pressure measurement. In patients known or found to be hypertensive, measurement on the bare arm is recommended.
AB - Background. This study examined the effect of measuring blood pressure below subjects' rolled-up sleeves, over the sleeve, or on the bare arm. This is an important day-to-day issue for the busy GP. Methods. The sample consisted of 201 subjects in family practice clinics and residents of a senior citizens' home. A digital device was used in all cases. Each participant underwent three blood pressure measurements in each of the following conditions in random order: cuff on bare arm; cuff over the sleeve; and cuff below the rolled-up sleeve. Differences between measurements were plotted against the mean blood pressure. Confounding factors controlled for were age, sex, clothing pressure and skin-fold thickness. Results. Differences in mean blood pressure readings between the clothed and bare arm were 0.5 mmHg (SD 7.5) for systolic pressure and 1 mmHg (SD 5) for diastolic pressure; neither difference was significant. However, in hypertensive subjects (>140 mmHg systolic), although the mean difference remained small (systolic pressure, 2 mmHg, SD 10), the range of difference for individual subjects was -32 mmHg to +22 mmHg. Conclusion. The degree of clothing under the sphygmomanometer cuff does not have a clinically important effect on the blood pressure measurement. In patients known or found to be hypertensive, measurement on the bare arm is recommended.
KW - Blood pressure
KW - Blood pressure cuff
KW - Family medicine
KW - Measurements
KW - Screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346966809&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/fampra/cmg618
DO - 10.1093/fampra/cmg618
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 14701900
AN - SCOPUS:0346966809
SN - 0263-2136
VL - 20
SP - 730
EP - 732
JO - Family Practice
JF - Family Practice
IS - 6
ER -