Abstract
Decision Support Systems have been widely used in business and engineering applications. Because sentencing is primarily concerned with consistency of process rather than consistency of outcome, it has not been a fruitful area for decision support research. We give an outline of the need for decision support to support sentencing decision-making. We examine current sentencing decision support systems and compare their different aims and users.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 523-552 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Journal of Decision Systems |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Criminal Sentencing
- Decision Support
- Discretionary Reasoning
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing sentencing decision support systems for judges and lawyers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver