Community structure and diversity of soil arthropods in naturally restored sandy grasslands after grazing

Ren Tao Liu, Ha Lin Zhao, Xue Yong Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Taking the Naiman Desertification Research Station under Chinese Academy of Sciences as a base, an investigation was conducted on the community structure of soil arthropods in the naturally restored sandy grasslands after different intensity grazing disturbance, with the effects of vegetation and soil on this community structure approached. In the non-grazing grassland, soil arthropods were rich in species and more in individuals, and had the highest diversity. In the restored grassland after light grazing, soil arthropods had the lowest evenness and diversity. In the restored grassland after moderate grazing, the individuals of soil arthropods were lesser but the major groups were more, and the evenness and diversity were higher. In the restored grassland after heavy grazing, the individuals of soil arthropods were more but the major groups were lesser, and the diversity was higher. Plant individuals ' number, vegetation height and coverage, and soil alkalinity were the main factors affecting the soil arthropod community in naturally restored grasslands after different intensity grazing disturbance. It was implied that after 12-year exclosure of grassland, soil arthropod community could be recovered to some degree, while grazing disturbance had long-term negative effects on the arthropod community.

Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)2849-2855
Number of pages7
JournalChinese Journal of Applied Ecology
Volume21
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ground vegetation
  • Restoration after grazing
  • Sandy grassland
  • Soil fauna
  • Soil property

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Community structure and diversity of soil arthropods in naturally restored sandy grasslands after grazing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this