Collaborative and competitive motivations uniquely impact infants’ racial categorization

Matar Ferera, Andrew Scott Baron, Gil Diesendruck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Human history has been plagued by violent inter-group conflicts. Such conflicts are arguably grounded on group biases – particularly, a tendency to favor “ingroups” over “outgroups” – manifested in adults, children, and infants. A question these findings prompt is what motivates social categorization? Here it is shown that priming 14-month-old infants (N = 144) with collaborative or competitive interactions affects their capacity to form racial categories, and that this effect varies according to the gender of the exemplars being categorized. Specifically, whereas racial categorization of women was facilitated by collaboration, racial categorization of men was facilitated by competition. The presence of these differential effects in infancy is consistent with the idea that social categorization is driven by fundamental functions of group relations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)511-519
Number of pages9
JournalEvolution and Human Behavior
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.

Keywords

  • Collaboration
  • Competition
  • Evolutionary psychology
  • Infancy
  • Social categorization
  • Social motivations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collaborative and competitive motivations uniquely impact infants’ racial categorization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this