TY - JOUR
T1 - Cochlear implantation outcome in straightforward cases
T2 - can we do more for adults who cannot understand speech using hearing aids alone?
AU - Luntz, Michal
AU - Khuri, Mahir
AU - Khayr, Ranin
AU - Gedaon Khuri, Wadeah
AU - Yehudai, Noam
AU - Shpak, Talma
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Acta Oto-Laryngologica AB (Ltd).
PY - 2018/12/2
Y1 - 2018/12/2
N2 - Background: Many adults with moderate–profound hearing loss whose speech recognition has deteriorated and are no longer benefitting from hearing aids (HAs) could benefit from cochlear implantation (CI). Of these, only <5% are implanted. In order to inform eligible patients about expected results and ease the route to implantation, better guidelines for candidate selection are needed. Objectives: To provide reliable guidelines by determining, in a well-characterized group of implantees, the minimal expected post-CI scores for monosyllabic (MS) word recognition. Patients and methods: In total, 20 adults unilateral implantees considered (prior to implantation) straightforward CI candidates were assessed ≥20 months post-CI. Their post-CI CI-aided thresholds and MS word recognition were compared to their pre-CI scores. In addition, SSQ12 scores were evaluated post-CI. Results: Post-CI, thresholds were 40 dB or better in all participants, and 35 dB or better in 95% of them. 90% scored 60% or better on MS words in quiet. In speech noise all scored 15–60% and 50% scored 45–60%. Poorer unaided pre-CI thresholds yielded greater patient satisfaction. Conclusions: Adults with moderate–profound hearing loss, whose speech recognition has deteriorated, are no longer benefitting from HAs and fulfil defined criteria for straightforward CI, should be referred for formal CI candidacy evaluation.
AB - Background: Many adults with moderate–profound hearing loss whose speech recognition has deteriorated and are no longer benefitting from hearing aids (HAs) could benefit from cochlear implantation (CI). Of these, only <5% are implanted. In order to inform eligible patients about expected results and ease the route to implantation, better guidelines for candidate selection are needed. Objectives: To provide reliable guidelines by determining, in a well-characterized group of implantees, the minimal expected post-CI scores for monosyllabic (MS) word recognition. Patients and methods: In total, 20 adults unilateral implantees considered (prior to implantation) straightforward CI candidates were assessed ≥20 months post-CI. Their post-CI CI-aided thresholds and MS word recognition were compared to their pre-CI scores. In addition, SSQ12 scores were evaluated post-CI. Results: Post-CI, thresholds were 40 dB or better in all participants, and 35 dB or better in 95% of them. 90% scored 60% or better on MS words in quiet. In speech noise all scored 15–60% and 50% scored 45–60%. Poorer unaided pre-CI thresholds yielded greater patient satisfaction. Conclusions: Adults with moderate–profound hearing loss, whose speech recognition has deteriorated, are no longer benefitting from HAs and fulfil defined criteria for straightforward CI, should be referred for formal CI candidacy evaluation.
KW - CI candidacy
KW - monosyllabic word recognition
KW - SSQ12
KW - thresholds with CI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060913570&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00016489.2018.1516298
DO - 10.1080/00016489.2018.1516298
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 30686138
AN - SCOPUS:85060913570
SN - 0001-6489
VL - 138
SP - 1070
EP - 1079
JO - Acta Oto-Laryngologica
JF - Acta Oto-Laryngologica
IS - 12
ER -