Closed-loop glucose control in young people with type 1 diabetes during and after unannounced physical activity: a randomised controlled crossover trial

Klemen Dovc, Maddalena Macedoni, Natasa Bratina, Dusanka Lepej, Revital Nimri, Eran Atlas, Ido Muller, Olga Kordonouri, Torben Biester, Thomas Danne, Moshe Phillip, Tadej Battelino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

66 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Hypoglycaemia during and after exercise remains a challenge. The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of closed-loop insulin delivery during unannounced (to the closed-loop algorithm) afternoon physical activity and during the following night in young people with type 1 diabetes. Methods: A randomised, two-arm, open-label, in-hospital, crossover clinical trial was performed at a single site in Slovenia. The order was randomly determined using an automated web-based programme with randomly permuted blocks of four. Allocation assignment was not masked. Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes who were experienced insulin pump users were eligible for the trial. During four separate in-hospital visits, the participants performed two unannounced exercise protocols: moderate intensity (55% of V⋅ O 2 max) and moderate intensity with integrated high-intensity sprints (55/80% of V⋅ O 2 max), using the same study device either for closed-loop or open-loop insulin delivery. We investigated glycaemic control during the exercise period and the following night. The closed-loop insulin delivery was applied from 15:00 h on the day of the exercise to 13:00 h on the following day. Results: Between 20 January and 16 June 2016, 20 eligible participants (9 female, mean age 14.2 ± 2.0 years, HbA1c 7.7 ± 0.6% [60.0 ± 6.6 mmol/mol]) were included in the trial and performed all trial-mandated activities. The median proportion of time spent in hypoglycaemia below 3.3 mmol/l was 0.00% for both treatment modalities (p = 0.7910). Use of the closed-loop insulin delivery system increased the proportion of time spent within the target glucose range of 3.9–10 mmol/l when compared with open-loop delivery: 84.1% (interquartile range 70.0–85.5) vs 68.7% (59.0–77.7), respectively (p = 0.0057), over the entire study period. This was achieved with significantly less insulin delivered via the closed-loop (p = 0.0123). Conclusions/interpretation: Closed-loop insulin delivery was safe both during and after unannounced exercise protocols in the in-hospital environment, maintaining glucose values mostly within the target range without an increased risk of hypoglycaemia. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02657083 Funding: University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenian National Research Agency, and ISPAD Research Fellowship.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2157-2167
Number of pages11
JournalDiabetologia
Volume60
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, The Author(s).

Funding

Funding The study was funded in part by the University Medical Centre Ljubljana Research and Development Grant no. 20110359. KD, NB and TaB were funded in part by the Slovenian National Research Agency Grants no. J3–6798, V3–1505 and P3–0343. MM was funded in part by the ISPAD Research Fellowship Grant 2015. The funders of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report. This was an investigator Initiated Study, sponsored by the University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Ljubljana, Slovenia. There was no commercial sponsor for this study. Investigators purchased/owned all study materials. DreaMed Diabetes, Petah Tikva, Israel allowed us free use of closed-loop algorithm Glucositter. The authors thank nurses and nurse educators from the Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Children?s Hospital in Ljubljana. An abstract with partial study data was presented in February 2017 at the Advanced Technologies & Treatment for Diabetes conference in Paris. The study was funded in part by the University Medical Centre Ljubljana Research and Development Grant no. 20110359. KD, NB and TaB were funded in part by the Slovenian National Research Agency Grants no. J3?6798, V3?1505 and P3?0343. MM was funded in part by the ISPAD Research Fellowship Grant 2015. The funders of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report.

FundersFunder number
Faculty of Medicine, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Slovenian National Research AgencyJ3–6798, P3–0343
University Medical Centre Ljubljana Research and Development20110359
Univerza v Ljubljani
International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes

    Keywords

    • Clinical science
    • Devices
    • Diabetes in childhood
    • Exercise
    • Hypoglycaemia

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Closed-loop glucose control in young people with type 1 diabetes during and after unannounced physical activity: a randomised controlled crossover trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this