Clinical Consensus Statement: Vaginal Energy-Based Devices

  • Jonia Alshiek
  • , Bobby Garcia
  • , Vatche Minassian
  • , Cheryl B. Iglesia
  • , Amanda Clark
  • , Eric R. Sokol
  • , Miles Murphy
  • , Shazia A. Malik
  • , Alexis Kimble
  • , S. Abbas Shobeiri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Abstract: This clinical consensus statement on vaginal energy-based devices (EBDs) reflects an update by content experts from the American Urogynecologic Society's EBD writing group. In 2019, the American Urogynecologic Society's EBD writing group used a modified Delphi process to assess statements that were evaluated for consensus after a structured literature search. A total of 40 statements were assessed and divided into 5 categories: (1) patient criteria, (2) health care provider criteria, (3) efficacy, (4) safety, and (5) treatment considerations. Of the 40 statements that were assessed, 28 reached consensus and the remaining 12 did not. Lack of evidence was among the main reasons that vulvovaginal EBD treatment statements did not reach consensus. In March 2022, these statements were reassessed using the interim literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)633-648
Number of pages16
JournalUrogynecology
Volume28
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Urogynecologic Society.

Keywords

  • CO 2 laser
  • Er:YAG
  • dyspareunia
  • energy-based devices
  • fecal incontinence
  • frequency
  • laser
  • lichen sclerosis
  • overactive bladder
  • radiofrequency
  • stress urinary incontinence
  • urgency
  • urgency incontinence
  • vaginal laxity
  • vaginal/vulvovaginal atrophy
  • vulvodynia/vestibulitis/vulvar pain sexual dysfunction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Consensus Statement: Vaginal Energy-Based Devices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this