Abstract
Samuel Huntington's "clash of civilizations" thesis, if nothing else, has sparked a debate over the nature of conflict in the post-Cold War era. Huntington predicts that future conflict, including conflict in the Middle East, will be mostly between civilizations. However, many disagree and variously predict that conflict in general will decline or that it will continue to be fought along more traditional lines. Two traditional bases for ethnic conflict that are particularly relevant to the Middle East are religion and nationalism. Accordingly, this study assesses the comparative impact of civilization, religion, and nationalism on ethnic rebellion in the Middle East. The results show that both conflict in general and civilizational conflict in particular in the Middle East dropped significantly after the end of the Cold War, thus contradicting Huntington's theory. Also it is shown that the most violent rebellions in the Middle East tend to be national conflicts rather than religious ones.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 177-204 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Jewish Political Studies Review |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 1/2 |
| State | Published - 2001 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
RAMBI Publications
- RAMBI Publications
- Arab-Israeli conflict -- 1948-
- Israel -- Social conditions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Civilizational, Religious, and National Explanations for Ethnic Rebellion in the Post-Cold War Middle East'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver