TY - JOUR
T1 - Chromatic Multifocal Pupillometer for Objective Perimetry and Diagnosis of Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa
AU - Chibel, Ron
AU - Sher, Ifat
AU - Ben Ner, Daniel
AU - Mhajna, Mohamad O.
AU - Achiron, Asaf
AU - Hajyahia, Soad
AU - Skaat, Alon
AU - Berchenko, Yakir
AU - Oberman, Bernice
AU - Kalter-Leibovici, Ofra
AU - Freedman, Laurence
AU - Rotenstreich, Ygal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Purpose To assess visual field (VF) defects and retinal function objectively in healthy participants and patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) using a chromatic multifocal pupillometer. Design Cross-sectional study. Participants The right eyes of 16 healthy participants and 13 RP patients. Methods Pupil responses to red and blue light (peak, 485 and 625 nm, respectively) presented by 76 light-emitting diodes, 1.8-mm spot size at different locations of a 16.2° VF were recorded. Subjective VFs of RP patients were determined using chromatic dark-adapted Goldmann VFs (CDA-GVFs). Six healthy participants underwent 2 pupillometer examinations to determine test–retest reliability. Main Outcome Measures Three parameters of pupil contraction were determined automatically: percentage of change of pupil size (PPC), maximum contraction velocity (MCV; in pixels per second), and latency of MCV (LMCV; in seconds). The fraction of functional VF was determined by CDA-GVF. Results In healthy participants, higher PPC and MCV were measured in response to blue compared with red light. The LMCV in response to blue light was relatively constant throughout the VF. Healthy participants demonstrated higher PPC and MCV and shorter LMCV in central compared with peripheral test points in response to red light. Test–retest correlation coefficients were 0.7 for PPC and 0.5 for MCV. In RP patients, test point in which the PPC and MCV were lower than 4 standard errors from the mean of healthy participants correlated with areas that were indicated as nonseeing by CDA-GVF. The mean absolute deviation in LMCV parameter in response to the red light between different test point was significantly higher in RP patients (range, 0.16–0.47) than in healthy participants (range, 0.02–0.16; P < 0.0001) and indicated its usefulness as a diagnostic tool with high sensitivity and specificity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), 0.97, Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon analysis). Randomly reducing the number of test points to a total of 15 points did not significantly reduce the AUC in RP diagnosis based on this parameter. Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a chromatic multifocal pupillometer for objective diagnosis of RP and assessment of VF defects.
AB - Purpose To assess visual field (VF) defects and retinal function objectively in healthy participants and patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) using a chromatic multifocal pupillometer. Design Cross-sectional study. Participants The right eyes of 16 healthy participants and 13 RP patients. Methods Pupil responses to red and blue light (peak, 485 and 625 nm, respectively) presented by 76 light-emitting diodes, 1.8-mm spot size at different locations of a 16.2° VF were recorded. Subjective VFs of RP patients were determined using chromatic dark-adapted Goldmann VFs (CDA-GVFs). Six healthy participants underwent 2 pupillometer examinations to determine test–retest reliability. Main Outcome Measures Three parameters of pupil contraction were determined automatically: percentage of change of pupil size (PPC), maximum contraction velocity (MCV; in pixels per second), and latency of MCV (LMCV; in seconds). The fraction of functional VF was determined by CDA-GVF. Results In healthy participants, higher PPC and MCV were measured in response to blue compared with red light. The LMCV in response to blue light was relatively constant throughout the VF. Healthy participants demonstrated higher PPC and MCV and shorter LMCV in central compared with peripheral test points in response to red light. Test–retest correlation coefficients were 0.7 for PPC and 0.5 for MCV. In RP patients, test point in which the PPC and MCV were lower than 4 standard errors from the mean of healthy participants correlated with areas that were indicated as nonseeing by CDA-GVF. The mean absolute deviation in LMCV parameter in response to the red light between different test point was significantly higher in RP patients (range, 0.16–0.47) than in healthy participants (range, 0.02–0.16; P < 0.0001) and indicated its usefulness as a diagnostic tool with high sensitivity and specificity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), 0.97, Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon analysis). Randomly reducing the number of test points to a total of 15 points did not significantly reduce the AUC in RP diagnosis based on this parameter. Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a chromatic multifocal pupillometer for objective diagnosis of RP and assessment of VF defects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982272997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.05.038
DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.05.038
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 27432203
AN - SCOPUS:84982272997
SN - 0161-6420
VL - 123
SP - 1898
EP - 1911
JO - Ophthalmology
JF - Ophthalmology
IS - 9
ER -