Characterizing multi-door criminal justice: A comparative analysis of three criminal justice mechanisms

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article provides an empirical, comparative analysis of three criminal justice programs that reflect different social and ideological accounts: Community courts, arraignment hearings, and restorative justice. The study draws on empirical findings that have been collected over three years in Israel, through observations and archival documentation of these mechanisms. Using the Criminal Law Taxonomy developed elsewhere by the authors as an analytical tool, the comparison is based on characteristics that relate to the structure, content, stakeholders, and outcomes of these justice mechanisms, emphasizing the plurality we have today in multi-door criminal justice systems. The comparative analysis highlights differences and similarities among various justice mechanisms, and offers policy makers and criminal justice practitioners important insights for referring different cases to various mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-166
Number of pages28
JournalNew Criminal Law Review
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Characterizing multi-door criminal justice: A comparative analysis of three criminal justice mechanisms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this