Characteristics of BRAFV600E Mutant, Deficient Mismatch Repair/Proficient Mismatch Repair, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Series of 287 Patients

Christelle de la Fouchardière, Romain Cohen, David Malka, Rosine Guimbaud, Héloïse Bourien, Astrid Lièvre, Wulfran Cacheux, Pascal Artru, Eric François, Marine Gilabert, Emmanuelle Samalin-Scalzi, Aziz Zaanan, Vincent Hautefeuille, Benoit Rousseau, Hélène Senellart, Romain Coriat, Ronan Flippot, Françoise Desseigne, Audrey Lardy-Cleaud, David Tougeron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: BRAFV600E mutations occurring in about 10% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) are usually associated with a poor outcome. However, their prognostic factors are unknown. Materials and Methods: We built a multicenter clinico-biological database gathering data from patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC treated in one of the 16 French centers from 2006 to 2017. The primary endpoint was to identify prognostic factors using a Cox model. Results: We included 287 patients (median age, 67 years [28–95]; female, 57%). Their median overall survival was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.97–27.04), and median progression-free survival in the first-line setting was 4.34 months (95% CI, 3.81–5.03). Chemotherapy regimen and biological agents (antiangiogenic or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor) were not associated with overall and progression-free survival. Stage IV disease (synchronous metastases) and absence of curative-intent surgery were statistically associated with poor overall survival. Among the 194 patients with mismatch repair (MMR) status available, overall survival was significantly longer in patients with deficient MMR tumors compared with those with proficient MMR tumors (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.56; p =.009). Conclusion: Despite that BRAFV600E-mutant mCRCs are associated with poor overall and progression-free-survival, patients with deficient MMR tumors and/or resectable disease experienced a longer survival. These results highlight the importance of MMR testing and resectability discussion in patients with BRAFV600E mCRC in day-to-day practice. Implications for Practice: Mismatch repair (MMR) testing and resectability discussion in patients with BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) should be performed in day-to-day practice to steer treatment decision making in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e1331-e1340
JournalOncologist
Volume24
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© AlphaMed Press 2019

Keywords

  • BRAF
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Decision making
  • Mismatch repair testing
  • Prognostic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Characteristics of BRAFV600E Mutant, Deficient Mismatch Repair/Proficient Mismatch Repair, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Series of 287 Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this