TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges and opportunities from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) research summit on improving diagnosis
T2 - A proceedings review
AU - Henriksen, Kerm
AU - Dymek, Chris
AU - Harrison, Michael I.
AU - Brady, P. Jeffrey
AU - Arnold, Sharon B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
PY - 2017/6/27
Y1 - 2017/6/27
N2 - The Improving Diagnosis in Health Care report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) provided an opportunity for many groups to reflect on the role they could play in taking actions to improve diagnostic safety. As part of its own process, AHRQ held a research summit in the fall of 2016, inviting members from a diverse collection of organizations, both inside and outside of Government, to share their suggestions regarding what is known about diagnosis and the challenges that need to be addressed. The goals of the summit were to learn from the insights of participants; examine issues associated with definitions of diagnostic error and gaps in the evidence base; explore clinician and patient perspectives; gain a better understanding of data and measurement, health information technology, and organizational factors that impact the diagnostic process; and identify potential future directions for research. Plenary sessions focused on the state of the new diagnostic safety discipline followed by breakout sessions on the use of data and measurement, health information technology, and the role of organizational factors. The proceedings review captures many of the key challenges and areas deserving further research, revealing stimulating yet complex issues.
AB - The Improving Diagnosis in Health Care report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) provided an opportunity for many groups to reflect on the role they could play in taking actions to improve diagnostic safety. As part of its own process, AHRQ held a research summit in the fall of 2016, inviting members from a diverse collection of organizations, both inside and outside of Government, to share their suggestions regarding what is known about diagnosis and the challenges that need to be addressed. The goals of the summit were to learn from the insights of participants; examine issues associated with definitions of diagnostic error and gaps in the evidence base; explore clinician and patient perspectives; gain a better understanding of data and measurement, health information technology, and organizational factors that impact the diagnostic process; and identify potential future directions for research. Plenary sessions focused on the state of the new diagnostic safety discipline followed by breakout sessions on the use of data and measurement, health information technology, and the role of organizational factors. The proceedings review captures many of the key challenges and areas deserving further research, revealing stimulating yet complex issues.
KW - diagnosis
KW - diagnostic error
KW - diagnostic process
KW - health information technology
KW - measurement
KW - organizational factors
KW - patient safety
KW - research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042102287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/dx-2017-0016
DO - 10.1515/dx-2017-0016
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 29536924
AN - SCOPUS:85042102287
SN - 2194-8011
VL - 4
SP - 57
EP - 66
JO - Diagnosis
JF - Diagnosis
IS - 2
ER -