Abstract
Cauchy's sum theorem is a prototype of what is today a basic result on the convergence of a series of functions in undergraduate analysis. We seek to interpret Cauchy’s proof, and discuss the related epistemological questions involved in comparing distinct interpretive paradigms. Cauchy’s proof is often interpreted in the modern framework of a Weierstrassian paradigm. We analyze Cauchy’s proof closely and show that it finds closer proxies in a different modern framework.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 267-296 |
Number of pages | 30 |
Journal | Foundations of Science |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jun 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Funding
V. Kanovei was supported in part by the RFBR Grant Number 17-01-00705. M. Katz was partially funded by the Israel Science Foundation Grant Number 1517/12. We are grateful to Dave L. Renfro for helpful suggestions.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Russian Foundation for Basic Research | 17-01-00705 |
Israel Science Foundation | 1517/12 |
Keywords
- Cauchy’s infinitesimal
- Foundational paradigms
- Quantifier alternation
- Sum theorem
- Uniform convergence