Case manager follow-up to failed appointments and subsequent service utilization

Michael B. Blank, Matthew Y. Chang, Jeanne C. Fox, Carol Ann Lawson, Jules Modlinski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Case manager responses to failed appointments were monitored for 83 seriously mentally ill persons in a rural community mental health center. Case manager actions taken were grouped into four categories of follow-up from most intensive to least intensive: home visit, phone call, letter, and no follow-up. On the whole, case managers most frequently did not follow-up missed appointments (56.7%), followed up by letters (21.3%), and telephone calls (18.7%), and home visits (3.3%). Analyses revealed that home visits were most intensive and all clients who were visited following failed appointments did not fail the subsequent appointment. Clients who received telephone calls or letters were about equally likely to fail the subsequent appointment, but were much more likely to attend the subsequent appointment than were clients who received no follow-up to the failed appointment. Interestingly, clients who failed appointments and received no follow-up were much more likely to need emergency services rather than a regular appointment as their next contact with the clinic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-31
Number of pages9
JournalCommunity Mental Health Journal
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1996
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
National Institute of Mental HealthP50MH049173

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Case manager follow-up to failed appointments and subsequent service utilization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this