Capacity of interactive communication over erasure channels and channels with feedback

Ran Gelles, Bernhard Haeupler

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

We consider interactive communication performed over two simple types of noisy channels: binary error channels with noiseless feedback and binary erasure channels. In both cases, the noise model is adversarial. Assuming at most ε-fraction of the bits can be corrupted, we show coding schemes that simulate any alternating interactive protocol with rate 1-θ (H (ε)). All our simulations are simple, randomized, and computationally efficient. The rates of our coding schemes stand in contrast to the interactive communication rates supported by random or adversarial error channels without feedback, for which the best known coding schemes achieve rates of 1-θ (√ ε) and 1-θ (√ εloglogl/ε), respectively. As these rates are conjectured to be optimal, our result implies a large asymptotic gap between interactive communication rate over noisy channels with and without feedback. Such a gap has no equivalent in the standard one-way communication setting.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 26th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2015
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Pages1296-1311
Number of pages16
EditionJanuary
ISBN (Electronic)9781611973747
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes
Event26th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2015 - San Diego, United States
Duration: 4 Jan 20156 Jan 2015

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
NumberJanuary
Volume2015-January

Conference

Conference26th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2015
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Diego
Period4/01/156/01/15

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Capacity of interactive communication over erasure channels and channels with feedback'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this