Abstract
This work presents and analyzes four gaps in public diplomacy (PD) research: between and among disciplines, between theory and prac-tice, between theory and reality, and between theory and technology. The first two are known and have been researched albeit in general connec-tion with foreign policy, not with PD. The other two are just beginning to be researched. PD is the most multidisciplinary field ever developed. Yet, scholars from many disciplines in the humanities, social sciences, and technology haven’t yet found ways to expand collaboration. The world order is moving from a liberal system to an illiberal one. Much of the present literature has been pursued within the liberal order. PD scholars need to explore the roles and functions of PD in the emerging one. AI is relatively new but has already had significant effects on PD. The combi-nation of AI and disinformation could be disastrous to PD. This chapter presents ways to reduce the gaps, but the main conclusion is that only sustained and creative multidisciplinary research can close or reduce these gaps.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Diplomacy’s Public Turn |
| Subtitle of host publication | Prospects for Theory and Practice |
| Publisher | Springer Nature |
| Pages | 83-91 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783032128577 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783032128560 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2026 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2026.
Keywords
- AI
- Bridging gaps
- Practice
- Public diplomacy
- Soft power
- Theory
- Trump
- World order
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Bridging Gaps in Public Diplomacy Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver