Abstract
It is widely believed that the Internet's AS-graph degree distribution
obeys a power-law form. However, it was recently argued that since
Internet data is collected in a tree-like fashion, it only produces a sample of
the degree distribution, and this sample may be biased. This argument was
backed by simulation data and mathematical analysis, which demonstrated
that under certain conditions a tree sampling procedure can produce an artifi-
cial power-law in the degree distribution. Thus, although the observed degree
distribution of the AS-graph follows a power-law, this phenomenon may be an
artifact of the sampling process. In this work we provide some evidence to
the contrary. We show, by analysis and simulation, that when the underlying
graph degree distribution obeys a power-law with an exponent γ > 2, a tree-like
sampling process produces a negligible bias in the sampled degree distribution.
Furthermore, recent data collected from the DIMES project, which is not based
on single source sampling, indicates that the Internet indeed obeys a power-law
degree distribution with an exponent γ > 2. Combining this empirical data
with our simulation of traceroute experiments on DIMES-measured AS-graph
as the underlying graph, and with our analysis, we conclude that the bias in
the degree distribution calculated from BGP data is negligible.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 323-332 |
| Journal | Networks and Heterogeneous Media |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - 2006 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Bounding the bias of tree-like sampling in IP topologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver