Both indirect maternal and direct fetal genetic effects reflect the observational relationship between higher birth weight and lower adult bone mass

Jiang Wei Xia, Lin Zhang, Jin Li, Cheng Da Yuan, Xiao Wei Zhu, Yu Qian, Saber Khederzadeh, Jia Xuan Gu, Lin Xu, Jian Hua Gao, Ke Qi Liu, David Karasik, Shu Yang Xie, Guo Bo Chen, Hou Feng Zheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Birth weight is considered not only to undermine future growth, but also to induce lifelong diseases; the aim of this study is to explore the relationship between birth weight and adult bone mass. Methods: We performed multivariable regression analyses to assess the association of birth weight with bone parameters measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and by quantitative ultrasound (QUS), independently. We also implemented a systemic Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore the causal association between them with both fetal-specific and maternal-specific instrumental variables. Results: In the observational analyses, we found that higher birth weight could increase the adult bone area (lumbar spine, β-coefficient= 0.17, P < 2.00 × 10−16; lateral spine, β-coefficient = 0.02, P = 0.04), decrease bone mineral content-adjusted bone area (BMCadjArea) (lumbar spine, β-coefficient= − 0.01, P = 2.27 × 10−14; lateral spine, β-coefficient = − 0.05, P = 0.001), and decrease adult bone mineral density (BMD) (lumbar spine, β-coefficient = − 0.04, P = 0.007; lateral spine; β-coefficient = − 0.03, P = 0.02; heel, β-coefficient = − 0.06, P < 2.00 × 10−16), and we observed that the effect of birth weight on bone size was larger than that on BMC. In MR analyses, the higher fetal-specific genetically determined birth weight was identified to be associated with higher bone area (lumbar spine; β-coefficient = 0.15, P = 1.26 × 10−6, total hip, β-coefficient = 0.15, P = 0.005; intertrochanteric area, β-coefficient = 0.13, P = 0.0009; trochanter area, β-coefficient = 0.11, P = 0.03) but lower BMD (lumbar spine, β-coefficient = − 0.10, P = 0.01; lateral spine, β-coefficient = − 0.12, P = 0.0003, and heel β-coefficient = − 0.11, P = 3.33 × 10−13). In addition, we found that the higher maternal-specific genetically determined offspring birth weight was associated with lower offspring adult heel BMD (β-coefficient = − 0.001, P = 0.04). Conclusions: The observational analyses suggested that higher birth weight was associated with the increased adult bone area but decreased BMD. By leveraging the genetic instrumental variables with maternal- and fetal-specific effects on birth weight, the observed relationship could be reflected by both the direct fetal and indirect maternal genetic effects.

Original languageEnglish
Article number361
JournalBMC Medicine
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Oct 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81871831) and supported by the Chinese National Key Technology R&D Program, Ministry of Science and Technology (2021YFC2501702). This work was also supported by the joint program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and the Israel Science Foundation (ISF) (NSFC#32061143019 and ISF#3408/20).

FundersFunder number
Chinese National Key Technology R&D Program
National Natural Science Foundation of China81871831
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China2021YFC2501702
Israel Science Foundation32061143019, 3408/20

    Keywords

    • Birth weight
    • Bone mineral density
    • Fetal genetic effects
    • Maternal genetic effects
    • Mendelian randomization
    • Observational analysis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Both indirect maternal and direct fetal genetic effects reflect the observational relationship between higher birth weight and lower adult bone mass'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this