Bone Strength Estimated by Micro-Finite Element Analysis (µFEA) Is Heritable and Shares Genetic Predisposition With Areal BMD: The Framingham Study

David Karasik, Serkalem Demissie, Darlene Lu, Kerry E. Broe, Steven K. Boyd, Ching Ti Liu, Yi Hsiang Hsu, Mary L. Bouxsein, Douglas P. Kiel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Genetic factors contribute to the risk of bone fractures, partly because of effects on bone strength. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) estimates bone strength using micro-finite element analysis (µFEA). The goal of this study was to investigate if the bone failure load estimated by HR-pQCT-based µFEA is heritable and to what extent it shares genetic regulation with areal bone mineral density (aBMD). Bone microarchitecture was measured by HR-pQCT at the ultradistal tibia and ultradistal radius in adults from the Framingham Heart Study (n = 1087, mean age 72 years; 57% women). Radial and tibial failure load in compression were estimated by µFEA. Femoral neck (FN) and ultradistal forearm (UD) aBMD were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Heritability (h2) of failure load and aBMD and genetic correlations between them was estimated adjusting for covariates (age and sex). Failure load values at the non-weight-bearing ultradistal radius and at the weight-bearing ultradistal tibia were highly correlated (r = 0.906; p < 0.001). Estimates of h2 adjusted for covariates were 0.522 for the radius and 0.497 for the tibia. Additional adjustment for height did not impact on the h2 results, but adjustment for aBMD at the UD and FN somewhat decreased h2 point estimates: 0.222 and 0.380 for radius and tibia, respectively. In bivariate analysis, there was a high phenotypic and genetic correlation between covariate-adjusted failure load at the radius and UD aBMD (ρP = 0.826, ρG = 0.954, respectively), whereas environmental correlations were lower (ρE = 0.696), all highly significant (p < 0.001). Similar correlations were observed between tibial failure load and femoral neck aBMD (ρP = 0.577, ρG = 0.703, both p < 0.001; ρE= 0.432, p < 0.05). These data from adult members of families from a population-based cohort suggest that bone strength of distal extremities estimated by micro-finite element analysis is heritable and shares some genetic composition with areal BMD, regardless of the skeletal site.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2151-2156
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Bone and Mineral Research
Volume32
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award no. R01AR061445. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Additional support was provided by Friends of Hebrew SeniorLife and a research grant from the Investigator Initiated Studies Program of Merck Sharp & Dohme. DK was supported by ISF grant no. 1283/14.

FundersFunder number
Friends of Hebrew SeniorLife
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesR01AR061445, R01AR041398
Merck Sharp and Dohme
Iowa Science Foundation1283/14

    Keywords

    • BONE HR-QCT/MICRO-CT
    • FAILURE LOAD
    • FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
    • GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY
    • HERITABILITY

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bone Strength Estimated by Micro-Finite Element Analysis (µFEA) Is Heritable and Shares Genetic Predisposition With Areal BMD: The Framingham Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this