Bid2Charge: Market user interface design for electric vehicle charging

We consider settings where owners of electric vehicles (EVs) participate in a market mechanism to charge their vehicles. Existing work on such mechanisms has typically assumed that participants are fully rational and can report their preferences accurately to the mechanism or to a software agent participating on their behalf. However, this may not be reasonable in settings with non-expert human end-users. To explore this, we compare a fully expressive interface that covers the entire space of preferences to two restricted interfaces that reduce the space of possible options. To enable this analysis, we develop a novel game that replicates key features of an abstract EV charging scenario. In two extensive evaluations with over 300 users, we show that restricting the users' preferences significantly reduces the time they spend deliberating. More surprisingly, it also leads to an increase in their utility compared to the fully expressive interface (up to 70%). Finally, we find that a reinforcement learning agent displays similar performance trends, enabling a novel methodology for evaluating market interfaces.