TY - JOUR
T1 - Between the highland polity and philistia
T2 - The united monarchy and the resettlement of the shephelah in the iron age iia, with a special focus on tel ‘eton and khirbet qeiyafa
AU - Faust, Avraham
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Schools of Oriental Research.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - The Shephelah, one of Judah’s 8th century B.C.E. settlement hubs, was sparsely settled during the Iron Age I, when only a small Canaanite enclave survived in its eastern part. The resettlement of the Shephelah, beginning during the Iron Age I–II transition and lasting over 200 years, was a complex process that had two different facets. The first, better-known facet is the gradual establishment of dozens of new sites, the vast majority of which had clear connections to the highlands polity e.g., Lachish, Tel Zayit, Tel Burna. The second, less-discussed facet is the transformations experienced by the few settlements that existed in the region in the Iron Age I, most notably Tell Beit Mirsim, Beth-Shemesh, Tel ‘Eton, and Tel Halif. After presenting background data, the article will offer a detailed reconstruction of the processes through which the Shephelah became part of the highland polity, with a special focus on Tel ‘Eton and on the enigmatic, earlier, and short-lived site of Khirbet Qeiyafa. The paper will conclude with a detailed refutation of the recent suggestion that the small Iron Age I Canaanite enclave that existed in the eastern Shephelah developed into a large Iron Age IIA Canaanite polity.
AB - The Shephelah, one of Judah’s 8th century B.C.E. settlement hubs, was sparsely settled during the Iron Age I, when only a small Canaanite enclave survived in its eastern part. The resettlement of the Shephelah, beginning during the Iron Age I–II transition and lasting over 200 years, was a complex process that had two different facets. The first, better-known facet is the gradual establishment of dozens of new sites, the vast majority of which had clear connections to the highlands polity e.g., Lachish, Tel Zayit, Tel Burna. The second, less-discussed facet is the transformations experienced by the few settlements that existed in the region in the Iron Age I, most notably Tell Beit Mirsim, Beth-Shemesh, Tel ‘Eton, and Tel Halif. After presenting background data, the article will offer a detailed reconstruction of the processes through which the Shephelah became part of the highland polity, with a special focus on Tel ‘Eton and on the enigmatic, earlier, and short-lived site of Khirbet Qeiyafa. The paper will conclude with a detailed refutation of the recent suggestion that the small Iron Age I Canaanite enclave that existed in the eastern Shephelah developed into a large Iron Age IIA Canaanite polity.
KW - 10th century
KW - Israel
KW - Judah
KW - Khirbet Qeiyafa
KW - Philistia
KW - Shephelah
KW - Tel ‘Eton
KW - United Monarchy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082611982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/708235
DO - 10.1086/708235
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
SN - 0003-097X
VL - 383
SP - 115
EP - 136
JO - Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research
JF - Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research
IS - 1
ER -